9월 첫 일요일 전국 대체로 맑고, 강원·경상·제주 일부엔 비

9월의 첫 번째 일요일인 6일 전국 대부분 지역이 맑겠지만, 강원·경상·제주 일부 지역에는 비가 내리는 곳이 있을 것으로 보인다는 예보가 나왔다.
기상청은 6일과 7일은 전국이 대체로 맑겠으나, 강원 동해안·산지와 경상권, 제주도는 대체로 흐릴 것으로 보인다고 5일 예보했다. 6일 강원 산지와 경북 북동 산지, 제주도에 비가 내리는 곳이 있겠다. 같은 날 오후(12~18시)부터는 강원 동해안과 경북 북부 동해안, 밤(18~24시)부터는 부산·울산·경남동부 내륙, 경북 남부 동해안에 비가 내리는 곳이 있겠다.
6일 새벽(00~06시)부터 오전(06~12시) 사이 강원 동해안과 부산·울산·경남 동부 내륙, 경북 동해안에는 0.1㎜ 미만의 빗방울이 떨어지는 곳이 있겠다.
기상청은 당분간 기온이 평년(최저 16~22도, 최고 25~29도)과 비슷하거나 조금 높을 것으로 내다봤다. 다만 6일은 제주 서부, 7일은 전라권을 중심으로 최고체감온도가 31도 안팎으로 올라 덥겠다.
체감온도는 기온에 습도의 영향이 더해져 사람이 느끼는 더위를 정량적으로 나타낸 온도다. 습도 약 55%를 기준으로 습도가 10% 증가 또는 감소함에 따라 체감하는 온도가 약 1도 증가 또는 감소하는 특징을 보인다.
6~7일 예상 강수량은 강원 동해안·산지 5~10㎜, 부산·울산·경남 동부 내륙, 경북 동해안·북동 산지 5~10㎜, 제주도 산지·중산간 20~60㎜, 제주도 해안 5~20㎜ 등이다.
By Yoojin Kim, Industry News Reporter
Editor’s note: This is a full transcript of the interview published exclusively by the Kyunghyang Daily News. Excerpting the entire or any part of the text without consulting the interviewee or the editor is strictly prohibited.
(Click here for Korean version)
Q. In your recent New York Times op-ed, you argued that China may be the ultimate winner of intensifying U.S.-Canada trade conflict.
A. There are lot of trade wars going on right now. Most of them were initiated by President Trump, and most do not make much sense. The one trade war that does need to be fought right now is to deal with China’s growing market dominance across a lot of sectors. Part of the response has got to be the U.S. working with like-minded countries that have the same concerns with China, and getting them to do similar things toward China, whether raising tariffs, using subsidies, or industrial policy.
Right now we’re renegotiating the trade agreement with Canada and Mexico, and President Trump’s focus seems to be, through the use of his tariffs, to get more manufacturing in the U.S., even at the expense of manufacturing in Mexico, and especially Canada. However if you take away all manufacturing from Canada‘s automobile sector, by puting tariffs on Canadian cars, auto parts, steel, and aluminum, Canadian consumers would not want to buy more expensive cars built in America, without benefits in terms of local parts or assembly. They are just going to buy the cheaper vehicles from China.
Unless you allow other partners to have some benefits of the manufacturing sector too, they will not go along with our plan on China. China has 1.4 billion consumers, but the U.S. only has 340 million. We need to add Canada, Europe, Korea, and Japan, all of us, to have the possibility of competing in scale with China. By fighting with Canada, essentially, we’re making both of ourselves weaker in the bigger trade fight with China.
Q. Trump seems to be more interested in dealmaking with China, rather than coming up with a coordinated and collective response with like-minded countries on China.
A. The U.S. is not large enough by itself to tackle the problem that China poses. It would also be a lot cheaper for us if we share the costs of taking on China; the costs of incentivizing companies to create new supply chains out of China, through subsidies as the Trump administration is doing now for companies to do mining and processing for critical minerals so that we’re not as dependent on China. Tariffs impose costs on Americans, but if we have other countries that are having similar kinds of policies, they can share in those costs with us. Americans alone would not bear the burden of creating these alternative supply chains outside of China, so that we’re not vulnerable to acts of Chinese coercion.
Q. I think your argument may have some resonance with President Trump, since he demands greater burden sharing among allies. But there are concerns that tariffs are eroding traditional security alliances, just as we are seeing with the escalation of U.S-Canada conflict.
A. President Trump isn’t wrong about everything. We have to treat this burden sharing differently, given the new costs to deal with these new threats and to fight this new kind of trade war. A lot of America’s trading partners and allies have been very hesitant to do anything about the China problem, just expecting the U.S. to handle it. But Chinese export restrictions in 2025 on rare earth permanent magnets and Nexperia export restrictins impacted automotive supply chains in Europe, Japan, and Korea. Hopefully everyone has woken up to the serious threat.
The problem is, while countries have been woken up to that threat, they’re spending most of their time having to deal with the threat that President Trump is imposing on them through tariffs.
Q. On U.S.-ROK relations, tensions are ongoing over Korea’s pledges to invest in the U.S., the issue of Coupang. Now Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are faced with growing pressure to expand memory production in the U.S.
A. It is challenging because Korean companies have already made tremendous investments in the U.S. over the last five years, with the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act.
Memory is a special industry at a special moment in time, with the AI boom and the shortage of memory. Korean companies have made commitments to do big investments expanding their production capacity, mainly here in Korea. Certainly, the American government would like them to do some of that in the U.S.
Q. What realistic policy and business options does South Korea have to manage the U.S. demands for investment in memory facilities?
A. When it comes to security and resilience of supply chains, there could be arguments for doing more prodction in the U.S. or outside of Korea. As with TSMC in Taiwan, too much production of one thing in one geographic location can be really risky. Taiwan is subject to earthquakes, and now with climate change, there are typhoons, droughts, wildfires, and all kinds of risks to geographically concentrated production. The same risks to some extent apply to Korea. You do want to have a little bit more diversification, even though that’s going to be more expensive.
Whether that should be part of this deal with the Trump administration, there’s a big question about whether that deal is a good deal in the first place. But there are definitely arguments for partners and allies to better align their policies together to make sure that they’re doing things in a coordinated fashion so we’re not competing with each other.
We are worried that Chinese firms might enter the memory space. Chinese firms already have a growing presence in low-end legacy chips and logic space, and a growing presence in assembly, test, and packaging. The fact that Nexperia wafers manufactured at facilities in Europe had to be flown back to China for packaging and finishing is what gave the Chinese government the ability to impose those export restrictions last year. Still, it’s going to take three to five years before those facilities would come into operation, so it’s not going to resolve the memory shortage problem that we have today.
Q. On the artificial intelligence sector, there have been reports that the U.S. will request that allies and partners sever ties with China in terms of artificial intelligence cooperation. How should Korea respond to such a request?
A. Keep in as close communication with the U.S. administration as possible, because it’s been a little bit unclear what their ultimate objectives are.
The first Trump administration was the first to impose export controls on SMIC to address concerns about Chinese AI chip manufacturing capacity and the Biden administration went further. But then the Trump administration last year has loosened some controls to allow China to purchase some of the NVIDIA chips. The administration’s view seems to be that a way to slow the indigenous Chinese ecosystem is to flood their market with the better NVIDIA chips. Allies have to ask Washington what the policy actually is, because of potential inconsistencies. For Korea, that has significant equities and expertise, educating them about blind spots is super important.
Q. What kind of anticipation do you have for the U.S.-China summit? Do you think they would extend to some kind of a trade truce again, or would they go on the course of conflict?
A. I have very modest expectations. Trade statistics show China is not buying a whole lot more U.S. farm products, as part of the $200 billion deal from Trump‘s first term. The U.S.-China Board of Trade, as the Ambassador Greer talked about, could lower tariffs for non-sensitive products, on $30 billion worth of stuff. Given all the other tariffs imposed, China could paradoxically end up getting lower tariffs than other countries.
However, these are very minor because China has incredible leverage over rare earths and permanent magnets, which can potentially shut down the U.S. automotive industry. Until we find alternative sources of supply, China maintains this leverage and you cannot put tariffs in place to diversify away from China.
Q. On rare earths, some middle-powered countries and the U.S. are interested in initiatives to partner with other countries so they could lower dependence on China. Do you think that kind of effort will work out?
A. When I listen to Prime Minister Carney or others talk about the middle powers approach, it sounds like they want to continue to have free trade or rules-based trade with all those other countries, when all of those countries already have really low trade barriers toward China.
To create alternative supply chains for mining, refining rare earths and other critical minerals and manufacturing permanent magnets where China has over 90% of the world’s supply, you have to create incentives for massive investments. Right now those companies don’t have those incentives, because China will instruct its state-owned firms to start dumping minerals on world markets, driving down prices and making those investments unprofitable. The only way is through subsidies, price guarantees, price floors, or tariffs on Chinese products. Until middle powers get serious about those questions, I don’t see how that solves the problem, because they can still be coerced by China. Canada was hit by those Nexperia export restrictions, and Honda had to shut down some of its production in Canada.
Q. Is the U.S. leadership of any sort essential in achieving the goal set forth by middle power countries?
A. I think it makes more sense to do it with the U.S., but it also requires the U.S. to put an attractive deal on the table. I do not criticize the Canadians, Mexicans, or Koreans for saying to the U.S. that they can’t work with them on this issue because the U.S. is hitting them with tariffs. The U.S. can’t have it both ways: the U.S. can’t expect those countries to do the hard policies too, but also be hitting those countries with tariffs and imposing additional costs on them.
Q. Do you think tariffs will remain as a core element of U.S. economic statecraft regardless of electoral shifts, like in the midterm elections or government changes?
A. Normatively, a tariff targeted against China for those products is a tool of economic statecraft that can help create the incentive for companies to generate alternative sources of supply.
The positive question of whether the tariffs likely remain is yes, because it’s going to be very difficult politically for the next administration to remove many of the tariffs. One, if these tariffs, both the forced labor tariffs and the upcoming tariffs on overcapacity, remain in place, they will bring in some revenue for the U.S. government. It’s not enough to close the deficit, but still enough that it will be very difficult to get rid of them without replacing them with some other form of revenue. In the U.S. political system, unless you have all three parts of the U.S. government lined up with the same party at the same time and prioritizing tax reform, it is very difficult.
The other is the difficulty with the forced labor tariffs. To get rid of them, a politician would have to make an argument proposing to remove tariffs placed on a country for forced labor, which immediately triggers public pushback over excusing forced labor. That’s a political argument that most politicians are not going to want to engage in.
Q. That would mean that a country like Korea, heavily reliant on exports, has to learn how to live in the world with constant tariffs.
A. President Trump is fighting ten trade wars at the same time, when only the one with China is one that needs to be fought. The general idea that trade wars are here to stay in one form or another is an unfortunate new reality, which makes it very complicated for countries like Korea that are very heavily dependent on exports.
The good news is, Korean companies make things that are essential. Imagine you didn’t have Samsung and SK making memory chips for AI. Korea makes stuff that the world needs right now, and you’re going to get slightly better treatment than a lot of other countries out there because of that. Korean battery companies and shipbuilding are the world’s leaders outside of China, too. Oftentimes, it’s Korean companies that are providing those alternatives.

울산이혼전문변호사, 개인대출정보조회, 보험회사아파트담보대출, 수원유치장접견변호사, 상수동싱크대막힘, 차구독, 양평동하수구막힘, 강남이혼전문변호사, 사대보험가입자대출, 신내동하수구막힘, 부산이혼전문변호사, 이혼재산분할, 안산이혼변호사, 장기렌트전기차, 수원불법촬영변호사, 포천학교폭력변호사, 개인회생인가대출, 청진동하수구막힘, 장기차량렌트, 안산음주운전변호사, 김해이혼전문변호사, 평택학교폭력변호사, 조정이혼, 마천동하수구막힘, 3개월차량렌트, 사업자렌트카, 불광동하수구막힘, 저신용중고렌트카, 무직자소액대출쉬운곳, 당일대출가능한곳, 가락동싱크대막힘, 자동차담보대출, 상수동하수구막힘, 의정부이혼전문변호사, 부평싱크대막힘, 시알리스 부작용, 1년렌트, 셀토스 리스, 개인신용대출, 2금융대출, 효창동하수구막힘, 상암동하수구막힘, 1박2일렌트, 수원성범죄변호사, 강남이혼전문변호사, 의정부학교폭력변호사, 신월동하수구막힘, 저축은행순위, 누상동하수구막힘, 북창동하수구막힘, 생활안정자금, 수원불법촬영변호사, 연수구변기막힘, 피망포커머니, 팔팔정 처방, 수원변호사, 인터넷가입, 성남하수구막힘, 비아그라 효과, 마포구싱크대막힘, 무방문무서류대출, 궁정동하수구막힘, SBI바빌론닷컴, 신용8등급대출, 5금융, 수원이혼변호사, 본동하수구막힘, 신용대출서류, 피망머니, 대전치과, 2금융전세대출, 대흥동하수구막힘, 수원강간변호사, 제기동하수구막힘, 비상금대출거절, 가리봉동하수구막힘, 사이트 상단노출, 5천만원대출, 외국인렌트카, 2금융권은행, 의정부검사출신변호사, 조정이혼, 비아그라 복용법, 용인불법촬영변호사, 분당성추행변호사, 주택담보추가대출, 시알리스 판매, 법인중고차, 렌트카, 연수구하수구막힘, 인스타그램 좋아요, 남산동하수구막힘, 새차견적, 구기동싱크대막힘, 무료상담, 월단위렌트, 신차렌트, 공릉동하수구막힘, 흥신소, https://www.likedental.co.kr/, 동숭동하수구막힘, 화천하수구막힘, 대구이혼전문변호사, 율현동하수구막힘, 녹번동하수구막힘, 천연동싱크대막힘, 서울성범죄전문변호사, 남양주이혼전문변호사, 개인회생중대출, 개인회생모바일대출, 양재동하수구막힘, 서울이혼변호사, 중고자동차렌트, 비대면모바일대출, 2차금융, 조정이혼, 자궁근종크기, 의정부형사전문변호사, 직업군인대출, 의정부성범죄변호사, 원남동하수구막힘, 사근동하수구막힘, 주말당일대출, 장기렌트업체, 모바일소액대출, 렌트카비교사이트, 포항이혼전문변호사, 원룸대출, 기초생활수급자대출, 천안이혼전문변호사, 불륜증거, SBI저축은행근로자햇살론, 신림동하수구막힘, 진천변기막힘, 장기렌트인수, 송파구변기막힘, 면목동하수구막힘, 탐정사무소, 아파트담보대출, 낙원동하수구막힘, 청라변기막힘, 개인대출가능한곳, 웹사이트 상위노출, 용인성범죄변호사, 신용대출필요서류, 검사출신변호사, 충주하수구막힘, 용인성범죄전문변호사, 소액간편대출, SBI대환대출, 수원학교폭력변호사, 방학동하수구막힘, 장기렌탈, 등촌동하수구막힘, 안양상간소송변호사, 평동하수구막힘, 주택담보대출한도, 네이버파워링크, 교직원대출, 잠실동싱크대막힘, 7000만원대출, 이혼전문변호사, 비아그라 후기, 돈의동하수구막힘, 개인회생인가결정대출, 대출비교사이트, 동소문동하수구막힘, 전농동하수구막힘, 남현동하수구막힘, 공주하수구막힘, 포항이혼전문변호사, 수원회생, 부천이혼전문변호사, 장기렌트카비교사이트, 용인이혼전문변호사, 상간남소송, 남창동하수구막힘, 직장인연체자대출, 신차장기렌트, 신차단기렌트, 신도림동하수구막힘, 무서류대출, 견지동싱크대막힘, 채무통합론, 대신동하수구막힘, 인천개인회생, 2금융전세자금대출, 효창동하수구막힘, 마천동싱크대막힘, 1년장기렌트, 동탄치과, 장기렌트리스, 안양이혼전문변호사, 운니동하수구막힘, 용인성범죄전문변호사, JB우리캐피탈, 카마그라, 동작동싱크대막힘, 미아동하수구막힘, 일산하수구막힘, 성내동싱크대막힘, 주택대환대출, 용강동하수구막힘, 대전치과, 월렌트, 성산동싱크대막힘, 이혼전문변호사, 오류동싱크대막힘, 자동차장기렌트, 피망슬롯머니상, 위자료, 당주동하수구막힘, 하월곡동하수구막힘, 서빙고동하수구막힘, 비아그라 효능, 관철동하수구막힘, 창원이혼전문변호사, 경기광주변기막힘, 신용카드소지자대출조건, 개인회생정부지원대출, 2금융권당일대출, 시알리스 효과, 가전내구제, 의정부이혼전문변호사, 잠원동하수구막힘, 의정부성범죄전문변호사, 보험설계사대출, 해피론, 대신동싱크대막힘, 경주이혼전문변호사, 폴스타4 장기렌트, 성남이혼전문변호사, 발기부전 원인, 양구싱크대막힘, 무직자신용대출, 개인회생미납대출, 재산분할, 도림동하수구막힘, 자양동하수구막힘, 방배동하수구막힘, 소액당일대출, 역촌동하수구막힘, 일주일렌트, 주택담보대출LTV, 성남이혼변호사, 흥신소, 근로자신용대출, 긴급생활자금, 미아동하수구막힘, 패륜사이트변호사, 단기월렌트카, 안양이혼전문변호사, 대출, 휴대폰성지, 용인성범죄변호사, 용인이혼변호사, 연건동싱크대막힘, 렌트카3개월, 난임진단서, 가양동하수구막힘, 용두동싱크대막힘, 의정부이혼전문변호사, 4000만원대출, 월렌트카가격비교, 합동하수구막힘, EV3 장기렌트, 수원학교폭력변호사, 공무원대출금리, 산림동하수구막힘, 정릉동하수구막힘, 의정부상간녀변호사, 12개월렌트카, 청암동하수구막힘, 제천하수구막힘, 청량리동하수구막힘, 파인론, 사업자대출, 무직연체자대출, 용문동싱크대막힘, 이촌동하수구막힘, 강남이혼변호사, 만21세장기렌트, 캐쉬, 용인형사전문변호사, 의정부대형로펌, 테슬라 모델Y 리스, 수원법무법인, 신촌동싱크대막힘, 자궁내막암 증상, 궁정동하수구막힘, 구구정 가격, 그랜저장기렌트, 서초구변기막힘, 시험관 1차, 수원법률사무소, 중고차렌터카, 단기대출, 저신용자대환대출, 이혼변호사, 차장검사출신변호사, 상간녀위자료, 우면동하수구막힘, 주부대출조건, 노원하수구막힘, 대구이혼전문변호사, 2금융권소액대출, 급전필요할때, 자양동하수구막힘, 후암동싱크대막힘, 가양동하수구막힘, 안양변기막힘, 독산동싱크대막힘, 이혼변호사, 창성동하수구막힘, 수원이혼변호사, 안산개인회생, 홈쇼핑렌터카, 마이너스통장, BMW X1 장기렌트, 소액론, 비아그라 약국, 시알리스 지속시간, 외국계은행대출, 안양이혼전문변호사, 영천동하수구막힘, 견지동하수구막힘, 수원이혼변호사, 오산하수구막힘, 북창동하수구막힘, 황학동하수구막힘, 5000만원대출, 재산분할, 평택하수구막힘, 직장인대출금리, 의정부음주운전변호사, 동선동하수구막힘, 충정로동하수구막힘, 의정부형사전문변호사, 테슬라 장기렌트, 서대문구싱크대막힘, 시알리스 복용법, 비아그라 효과, 자동차리스렌트, 서초상간녀소송변호사, 의정부대형로펌, 현석동하수구막힘, 이혼재산분할, 마곡동하수구막힘, 피망포커머니, 공항동하수구막힘, 세종이혼전문변호사, 병원마케팅, 신수동싱크대막힘, 중고차캐피탈, 소액론, 새내기직장인대출, 홈페이지 상단노출, 동대문하수구막힘, 안양음주운전변호사, 50대출, 안암동하수구막힘, 20만원소액대출, 그랑콜레오스 장기렌트, 암사동하수구막힘, 소상공대출, 개인회생대출, 빌라담보대출, 상간남소송, 대출이자계산, 묻지마대출, 승합차렌트비용, 용인음주운전변호사, 문배동하수구막힘, 햇살론유스, 직장인부채통합대출, 흥신소, 수원피부과, 시알리스 구입, 신차가격, 용산동하수구막힘, 창신동하수구막힘, 홍제동하수구막힘, 급돈, 구구정, 문정동하수구막힘, 이혼전문변호사, 상봉동하수구막힘, 인스타 팔로워 구매, 권농동하수구막힘, 대출상담사, 렌탈카, 대출상환계산기, 신계동하수구막힘, 비아그라 효능, 염곡동하수구막힘, 성범죄변호사, 괴산싱크대막힘, 홈페이지 상단노출, 은행단기대출, 신원동하수구막힘, 훈정동하수구막힘, 용인강간변호사, 르노 그랑콜레오스 장기렌트, 광희동하수구막힘, 저신용자사업자대출, 정부지원청년대출, 율현동하수구막힘, 제2금융권금리, 피망뉴베가스머니상, 피망포커머니, 청주이혼전문변호사, 연남동하수구막힘, 스팅어장기렌트, 렌트카저렴한곳, 국산차렌트, 천안이혼전문변호사, 급돈, 탐정사무소, 성남성범죄전문변호사, 여의도동하수구막힘, 삼선동하수구막힘, 이혼상담, 부암동하수구막힘, 장기렌터카, 사채업, 수원회생, 보험계약자론, 월렌트저렴한곳, 제네시스 G80 장기렌트, 학자금, 쉐보레 트랙스 장기렌트, 수원법무법인, 문래동하수구막힘, 등록대부업체조회, 안산이혼전문변호사, 성산동하수구막힘, 원남동하수구막힘, 장기렌트카법인, 아현동하수구막힘, EV6 롱레인지 장기렌트, 구의동싱크대막힘, 동선동하수구막힘, 중고차할부, 금호동하수구막힘, 산천동싱크대막힘, 인가결정대출, 개인회생기대출, 청담동하수구막힘, 상간녀소송, 40만원대출, 재직1개월미만대출, 고양이혼전문변호사, 관훈동하수구막힘, 금융계산기, 150대출, 답십리동싱크대막힘, 개인파산대출, 신용9등급대출, 비상금대출, 대환대출금리, 그랜저 장기렌트, 동자동하수구막힘, 개포동하수구막힘, 하남변기막힘, 연천싱크대막힘, 자동차가격, 도곡동하수구막힘, 수원개인회생, 수원마약전문변호사, 강동싱크대막힘, 문해력 책, 사업자대출, 비아그라 부작용, 용문동하수구막힘, 디올뉴 그랜저 장기렌트, 사업자대환대출, 중계동싱크대막힘, 석관동하수구막힘, 장기연체자대출가능한곳, 폰테크, 종로동하수구막힘, 당인동하수구막힘, 무직자대출, 내수동하수구막힘, 산림동하수구막힘, 정부지원저금리대출, 양천구싱크대막힘, 탐정사무소, 신용대출방법, 용인성범죄변호사, 인천변기막힘, 남양주변호사, 후암동하수구막힘, 인스타 팔로워 구매, 단기소액대출, 장기렌트견적, 카니발장기렌트, 경주이혼전문변호사, 그랜저하이브리드장기렌트, 마포하수구막힘, G80 장기렌트,